Archive

Author Archive

Cisco E4200 Firmware Added to Blog

Some users have been having issues with Townky Media server in the latest 1.0.02 firmware and have been wanting to downgrade. So I have added the both 1.0.01 and 1.0.02 to the blog and can be found on your right.

I am waiting for the latest 2.6 Kernel Broadcom drivers to make their way into the opensource disto’s so that I can try TomatoUSB firmware. Having said that, the stock firmware is very fast.

Categories: E4200

Cisco E4200 Firmware 1.0.02 Released

I guess I will now be posting blogs about the e4200 as well. Cisco has now released firmware v1.0.02 which includes IPv6. It might be interesting to note that the firmware has grown in size from the previous version 1.0.01 by 3 megabytes. I’ll try and make some time to investigate if they have moved to kernel 2.6 or if it is still with 2.4. At any rate, here is the change log:

Last Release Date: June 14, 2011
Last Firmware version: 1.0.02 (build 13)

- Added support of USB printer connected to the router’s USB port, so that
a user may send a print job to the printer via the local area network.
** This feature requires Cisco connect software v1.4 or later **
- Added support of Native IPv6 and 6rd tunnel Internet connections
- Added support of bridge mode
- Prevented devices on the guest network to access any private IP
address (RFC 1918)
- Updated wireless driver to improve interoperability
- Fixed some storage relative issues
- Fixed some browser-based configuration utility bugs
- Fixed some minor bugs

===========================================================================
Release Date: March 7, 2011
Firmware version: 1.0.01 (build 10)

- Fixed 2.4GHz wireless unstable issue
- Disabled IPv6-to-IPv4 Tunneling feature to improve Interoperability

===========================================================================
Release Date: Nov 14, 2010
Firmware version: 1.0.00 (build 13)

- Initial release

Categories: E4200

No More New Firmware for DIR855 DIR655 & DGL4500

Really bad news fellow DLink consumers;

I have had an interesting discussion with someone who develops firmware for network equipment. He/She suggests that there will be no more scheduled firmware releases for the DIR855, DIR655 and the DGL4500. DLink will most likely continue to sell these products until superseded by the upcoming new models, they should continue to provide technical support but there are likely no developers working on the current series product firmwares. The developers will all be allocated to the new upcoming models and subsequent firmware releases once the products are released.

You are most likely wrong if you think you are getting any more new firmwares unless something very drastic happens and the developers will need to be re-allocated to these products.

I do not know if DLink use internal developers or if they outsource the development but this is a sad turn of events for DLink customers.

Categories: FYI

Share Internet Connection Between 2 Houses

There are quite a number of people out there that will share their internet connection with another house. However, most believe that either, both houses must be on the same network/LAN or two networks/LANs and must be isolated (ie, first network cannot access the second).

Lets first layout the the topology so that I can explain the statement above.

  1. We have House 1 which has the internet subsciption
  2. House 1 and Router 1 setup to access the ISP and it’s IP address will most likely be 192.168.1.1
  3. We then have House 2 which is piggy backing off House 1 and sharing the subscription.
  4. We have PCs in House 1 using the subscription which we will call PCs 1
  5. PCs in House 2 using House 1 subscription which we will call PCs 2

What the majority of people will do when sharing the internet subscription in House 1 with House 2, is that they will setup a wireless connection between Router 1 and PCs 2 directly. The problem with this is that PCs 2 will have varying degrees of performance depending on their location relative to Router 1 and that PCs 2 maybe prone to dropouts. Further, if you sharing files between PCs 2, then performance will be really really bad and should one of the PCs 2 wireless connection dropout, then it will not be accessible for the rest of PCs 2.

The Standard Solution

The standard solution  (that Cisco, DLink, Netgear, etc try to sell you) is the setup a wireless bridge between the two houses. This is basically having 2 wireless access points that can be put into bridged mode, placed in each house. The two access points when placed into bridge mode, will act as if there is a virtual network cable between the two. So what you would do is take Access Point 1, connect it into one of the ports in Router 1 and place in an optimal location relative to House 2. You would then buy a Network Switch plug all PCs 2 into it, position Access Point 2 in an optimal location relative to House 1 and connect it to the Network Switch.

What you have achieved here is the fastest and most stable possible wireless connection between House 1 and House 2 that will not be prone to dropouts. Further more, file transfers between PCs 2 will be at least 10 times faster if not 20 to 30 times.

However, and here it comes, PCs 2 is very heavily dependant on Router 1 and the stability of the bridge between House 1 and House 2. Should Router 1 become offline, it will not only bring down PCs 1 but PCs 2 as well. Better yet, should the bridge become offline, then PCs 1 will still have an active network but  PCs 2 will all be offline.

Basically both houses form 1 network.

The Better Solution

Now that I have aquired my shiney new Cisco e4200 (which leaves my DLink DIR-855 in its dust) I figured l’d move the DLink into the second house and isolate the network (I have 2 houses on my land). So I have the Cisco as Router 1 in House 1 and the DLink as Router 2 on House 2. Basically, I replaced the switch in House 2 with Router 2 and plugged Access Point 2 into the WAN port of Router 2.

A very important note before I go on, you must have a different network address between House 1 and House 2. In my case, Router 1 is on network 192.168.1.0 and Router 2 is set to 192.168.2.0. DLink, by default, use 192.168.0.0 which isn’t good practice, I would avoid using this address, google it if you are interested but I am not going to elaborate on it as I would have to explain subnetting the 192.168 class first.

What you have achieved here is that you have created 2 isolated networks, should anything happen to Router 1 or the bridge, Network 2 and PCs’2 will be unaffected except that they will loose their internet connection.

However, what you will find so far, is that PCs’2 can access PCs 1 but not the other way. This is because the Router 2 is configured as a gateway and is performing NAPT (the manufactures misleading refer to it a NAT). NAPT or network address port translation effectively stops incoming traffic from the WAN port to the LAN if the LAN did not first establish the communication (google it for more details).

DLink routers will not allow you to change the router from Gateway to Router mode, they can be tricked into bridge mode but that will not allow you to create an isolated network. So if you do use a DLink as your Router 2, you will have to contend with double NAPT when access the internet or needless NAPT when accessing Network 1 from Network 2 or vice versa.

You will need to fix the IP address of WAN port on Router 2 for reasons explained later. There are two options here, you can set Router 2 internet connection to DHCP/Automatic IP address, at which case, in Router 1, you will need to set up a DHCP reservation for Router 2. Or you can specify Static IP for your internet connection in Router 2 with the following:

  1. IP Address, 192.168.1.2
  2. Subnet mask. 255.255.255.0
  3. DNS Address. 192.168.1.1

To allow PCs 1 to gain access to PCs 2, you will need to setup static routes in Router 1. Most routers should have this option but will look different in each brand of router. Basically what  you need to enter in is the following:

  1. Network Name, in this example, Network 2.
  2. Destination Network address, in this example, 192.168.2.0
  3. Subnet Mask, 255.255.255.0
  4. Gateway, this will be the IP address on the WAN port of Router 2 based on what you chose in the paragraph above.
Now, you will be able to access PCs 2 from PCs1.

Where still not quite there.

Even Better solution

If you can, do not use DLink on the second network but perhaps a router that will support DD-WRT/Open-WRT. Then you will be able to add the following in the commands menu:

iptables -I FORWARD -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I FORWARD -s 192.168.0.0/16 -j ACCEPT
Then save it to the firewall script. This will allow Network 1 to communicate with Network 2 and not just PCs 1 and PCs 2.

This helps with devices trying to discover services on the networks.

Closing Thoughts

If you want to share your Internet Subscription, then you have to learn a little bit about networking. If you want a stable network between the two, then you have to be prepared to spend some money. You don’t need the latest tech, but you will need more network devices and will have to manage them. The good thing about this though, once it is setup, it should not need to be fiddled with. If you can get network devices that use DD-WRT, then the networking world is at your feet but it is a little more effort to become more familiar with it. Finally, based on my experience, DLink products may not be ideal for this.

Cisco E4200 Comparison to DLink 855/655/4500/825A

April 25, 2011 4 comments

Just purchased the Cisco E4200 today as there was a 30% off all Network Equipment at a store in the local mall.

The 2.4GHz performance wasn’t that much more better than my DIR-855 but the 5.2GHz band was absolutely amazing. I cannot believe how much more better it is for performance and range.

The 855 much like the 655/825A/4500 have a very week 5GHz transmitter that really defeats the value of having a simultaneous dual band wireless router.

On the DLink DIR-855, i use to get between 2 and 16 mbs and lots of drop out in my lounge room, however, the Cisco E4200 delivers 100 mbs without drop outs in the lounge. That is a huge improvement and well worth the upgrade in my opinion as I can finally move all my N devices over to the other band and leave the 2.4 band for g devices. It was a pain in the backside when my squeezebox or iPhone where using the network at the same time as my notebook.

What is more impressive is that when I am sitting in the next room from the office where the router sits, I get between 405 and 450 mbs with my Intel 6300 wireless card in the notebook. How impressive is that :-)

The cisco firmware doesn’t have as many networking options in the admin pages like the DLink 855/655/825a/4500 but it does have multimedia features unlike the DLink products. Personally, the CPU is too slow for descent file serving performance and so I figure why do they bother? I have an Intel atom QNAP for all of that.

If you are interested in Dd-WRT for this baby, then you need to be patient as it is still WIP and there appears to be obe final bug that is stopping the 5,2 GHz band from using the WAN. Stay tuned as this should be fixed soon.

So I am now going to move the 855 onto my secondary network and let it sit there.

Poll of the Month: Would you recommend DLink to your friends

April 21, 2011 3 comments

Today I was asked why it had been so long since my last poll and I said, “there’s no issue to take a vote on at the moment”.

However, later on in the day, a colleague came to me asking what brand router they should get as they wanted an upgrade. I immediately said, which ever brand you settle on, DO NOT CHOOSE DLINK. I then began to explain to him all the quality issues with the firmware, how they don’t test their firmware before they release it to customers and how long they sit on issues before they acknowledge them, not to mention their support drones on the phone who just read from a script and actually have no idea about networking and routing.

So I thought, here we go, a poll with taking, Would You Recommend DLink to Your Friends.

Categories: FYI

UPDATE – DIR655A 1.34B7 /B8 Firmware Upgrade Issues

April 11, 2011 4 comments

Update to the Previous post DIR655A 1.34B7 /B8 Firmware Upgrade Issues

What a strange turn of events. The firmware doesn’t specify A4 only and neither do the change logs as shown below. The only difference between the A3 and A4 is the switch and wireless chipset generation (same brand and product line therefore perhaps driver compatibility). Yet the firmware appears to be incompatible with A3 and below. Comments welcomed PLEASE as only one commenter (David) has spoken up about this.

Change Log:

V 1.34WW, build 08 Beta, 2010/09/20,
Checksum:0x043294F8
1. Fixed bugs: DIR-655_A3_v1.34WWB02Beta-DIR-Static IP in dual access mode connection issue.

V 1.34WW, build 07 Beta, 2010/08/20,
Checksum: 0x043496AB
Problems Resolved:
1. Support 3G device DWM-156A3 

V 1.34WW, build 02 Beta, 2010/06/02,
Checksum: 0x0432AAC3
Problems Resolved:
1. Russia PPTP disconnection

V 1.34WW, build 01, 2010/04/14
Checksum: 0x0433011E
Problems Resolved:
1. supporting 12/24 time format.
2. Internet Usage Meter Widget support(2^64).
3. Set/Get command of HNAP
4. DWM-152/156 v1.04 driver support
5. Supporting ·sURL, http://router.dlink.com

V 1.31WW, build 09 Beta, 2010/03/10,
Checksum: 0x0434A700
1. remove PPP server subnet route
2. PPP IOT with Cisco 1750
3. remove VPN server duplicate route in DualAccess mode.
4. remove debug message, for full speed test.
5. remove duplicate default route (RU PPP fail, causes lan can not access internet)
Bugs/Issues
    1. With Intel 5100, will fix asap. user may turn off wmm first.
    2. PPTP disconnection in high speed mode (test in Beeline/Corbina office, download/upload 90/60Mbps)
    3. L2TP disconnection in DLink RU office. Need double confirm...
    4. some duplicate routing entries (may be caused by multicast from wan physical interface..., need to check)
Categories: DIR-655

DIR655A 1.34B7 /B8 Firmware Upgrade Issues

April 11, 2011 2 comments

Hi There;

It appears that users are having issues with flashing the latest firmware onto their DIR-655Ax. The reason for this appears to be a configuration format change and so the router will require a full hardware reset before you can flash again.

I suggest the following:

  1. Export out your configuration.
  2. Hardware reset your router using the 30/30/30 process
  3. Upgrade the router firmware
  4. Import your configuration

Please let me know if this works for you or not.

Categories: DIR-655

DIR855 1.23EU B06 Firmware Released

April 5, 2011 6 comments

DLink have release 1.23B06 edition firmware.

Changelog (if you can call it that):

  1. Support for DWM-156 H/W Rev.A3
  2. 2. Add Oops! Page

The build number is 183.

Get it here

Categories: DIR-855

DIR-655 1.34 Firmware Updates

April 1, 2011 2 comments

Firmware for the DIR-655 have been posted under links. They include the following:

Here is the change log for 1.34 WW:

V 1.34WW, build 08 Beta, 2010/09/20,
Checksum:0x043294F8
Fixed bugs:

  1. DIR-655_A3_v1.34WWB02Beta-DIR-Static IP in dual access mode connection issue.

V 1.34WW, build 07 Beta, 2010/08/20,
Checksum: 0x043496AB
Problems Resolved:

  1. Support 3G device DWM-156A3

V 1.34WW, build 02 Beta, 2010/06/02,
Checksum: 0x0432AAC3
Problems Resolved:

  1. Russia PPTP disconnection

V 1.34WW, build 01, 2010/04/14
Checksum: 0x0433011E
Problems Resolved:

  1. Supporting 12/24 time format.
  2. Internet Usage Meter Widget support(2^64).
  3. Set/Get command of HNAP
  4. DWM-152/156 v1.04 driver support
  5. Supporting ·sURL, http://router.dlink.com

EU Firmware change log looks a lot like the chklst.txt, here it is:

Project Name: DIR-655
HW version: A4
Region code: EU
WLAN Domain: 0×30/ETSI
Channel List 2.4G: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ,9, 10, 11, 12, 13
Firmware Query URL:http://wrpd.dlink.com.tw/router/firmware/query.asp?model=DIR-655_Ax_EU
Flash size: 4
MBDRAM size: 16MB
Algorithm: New Algorithm
Reference Mac: Wan Mac.

=================================================================
Release notes history.
=================================================================

ver1.34EUb07Beta, 2010/08/26, Matt

  1. Ubicom SDK 7.6.1 build 180, 2010, Aug 24, UBICOM_7_6_1_B0180
  2. Checksum: 0x0434C995

Problems Resolved:

  1. Fix “ACCESS CONTROL” wrong setting caused restore configuration file error.

ver1.34EUb06Beta, 2010/08/05, Matt

  1. Ubicom SDK 7.6.1 build 179, 2010, Jul 12, UBICOM_7_6_1_B0179
  2. Checksum: 0x043583CB

Problems Resolved:

  1. Support 3G device DWM-156A3

ver1.34EUb05Beta, 2010/07/12, Matt

  1. Ubicom SDK 7.6.1 build 179, 2010, Jul 12, UBICOM_7_6_1_B0179
  2. Checksum: 0x0434D3D9

Problems Resolved:

  1. Fix the Remote Management function doesn’t work.

ver1.34EUb04Beta, 2010/07/05, Jerry

  1. Ubicom SDK 7.6.1 build 177, 2010, Jun 22, UBICOM_7_6_1_B0177
  2. Checksum: 0x0434FFD2

Problems Resolved:

  1. Fix the Remote Management function doesn’t work.

ver1.34EUb03, 2010/04/12, Matt

  1. Ubicom SDK 7.6.1 build 170, 2010, Apr 12, UBICOM_7_6_1_B0170
  2. Checksum: 0x0435659A

Problems Resolved:

  1. Supporting DLink 404–>fix (when DNS query failed, 404 page wouldn¡¦t display on WIN7/Vista/Linux)

ver1.34EUb02, 2010/04/08, Matt

  1. Ubicom SDK 7.6.1 build 169, 2010, Apr 06, UBICOM_7_6_1_B0169
  2. Checksum: 0x043596AE

Problems Resolved:

  1. Supporting 12/24 time format
  2. Supporting DLink 404
  3. Remove advanced DNS service
  4. Internet Usage Meter Widget support(2^64).
  5. ¾×Set/Get command of HNAP
  6. DWM-152/156 v1.04 driver support
  7. DUT would keep rebooting, when client connects with DUT.

ver1.34EUb01, 2010/04/07, Matt

  1. Ubicom SDK 7.6.1 build 169, 2010, Apr 06, UBICOM_7_6_1_B0169
  2. Checksum: 0x04372EE4

Problems Resolved:

  1. Supporting 12/24 time format
  2. Supporting DLink 404
  3. Remove advanced DNS service
  4. Internet Usage Meter Widget support(2^64).
  5. ¾×Set/Get command of HNAP
  6. DWM-152/156 v1.04 driver support
Categories: DIR-655
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.